![]() I didn't know that the X to close the custom dialog isn't visible, but I want to remove this custom dialog (the first one that I created to mimic the ones in gymhntr) with a normal dialog for IITC based on jQuery UI, and readjust the way that features are provided so it make sense having the two links. #Firefox focus reddit install#And in mobile besides using IITCm it's possible to also install Tampermonkey with Firefox Mobile (at least in Android it works, it's not the best experience but sometimes I prefer it to IITCm) I stopped using Greasemonkey long ago and I use Tampermonkey in both Firefox and Chrome, last time that I tested it worked correctly even in Edge. Anyone that has it should remove it and you can remove any reference about it from this guide. Since some months ago it shouldn't be used so I've uploaded right now a version bump that prevents it from doing anything strange as it can happen when two different scripts try to provide the same features. #Firefox focus reddit code#I didn't notice the post and it shows me that there's room for improvements that I didn't realize previously.įirst of all, the "PoGo for portals" plugin was the development tests based on other existing code before merging it with the S2Check. My sense is that with this Manifest v3 stuff, or something similar, eventually Google is going to make it impossible for UBO to operate up to the standards Gorhill sets for it and then users may have to make a choice between Chrome and UBO. #Firefox focus reddit for android#Chrome for Android doesn't even allow extensions like UBO or other ad-blockers.Įven if you prefer Chrome on desktop, it might be worth giving Firefox on Android a try for the extensions alone:īut I do think it's fair to ask for help or support on any browser officially supported by the UBO extension. I'm posting this right now from Firefox for Android, which I have UBO installed on, along with a bunch of other extensions. Mozilla lets it incorporate features that Google won't allow UBO to incorporate on Chrome. So, having defended their right to be here, let me also say this, though. ![]() If Gorhill decides to pull UBO from the Chrome app store or Google decides to bar UBO or UBO-like extensions from Chrome and people in the future are just trying to jury rig a forked version of UBO roughly based on the code from the last Chrome version and/or the continuing Firefox versions of UBO, then is when I'd agree with telling them to go start their own sub-reddit. ![]() I'm not a fan of Chrome either, but, to be fair here, Chrome is an officially supported platform for UBO with an officially supported UBO extension, so it seems perfectly reasonable to me that people using UBO on Chrome would stop by the UBO sub-reddit to discuss any problems they are having. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |